A plain-English answer
A before-and-after biofield scan allows you to compare two technology-generated visualizations:
- The first visualization is created before energizing.
- Yvette completes the remote energizing stage.
- A second visualization is created afterwards.
You can then observe whether the system displays changes in:
- The shape of the visualized field
- The amount or distribution of pink
- How evenly the blue grid appears filled
- Differences between the front, sides and back
- The overall visual balance of the model
A visible difference means:
The second visualization looks different from the first.
It does not automatically mean:
- A disease improved
- An injury healed
- Inflammation decreased
- An emotional block was removed
- The nervous system was clinically regulated
- The energizing caused a measurable health benefit
The responsible interpretation lies between dismissing the difference as meaningless and treating it as medical proof.
Why the before-and-after comparison matters
Most aura services provide one result from one moment.
See Your Aura includes two complete 360° visualizations: one before energizing and one afterwards. Both can be viewed from the front, sides, back and every angle between. The client also receives still images and Yvette’s written interpretation.
This creates something tangible to compare.
Instead of simply being told:
Your energy changed.
you can inspect the two visualizations and ask:
- What looks different?
- Where did the pattern change?
- Is the change visible from several angles?
- Which areas remain similar?
- Does the second field appear more evenly filled?
- Did I personally notice anything during or after the process?
The comparison creates a useful visual conversation.
It is not, by itself, a controlled scientific experiment.
What happens during the See Your Aura process?
The client first submits an intake form and a suitable full-length photograph.
Yvette then creates the initial complete 360° visualization. After the remote energizing stage, she creates the second visualization and reviews both outputs before preparing the personal report.
The website’s genuine example shows:
- Pink areas across parts of the upper body before energizing
- Less prominent pink in several areas afterwards
- A blue field that appears more evenly filled in the second visualization
That visible comparison is real within the output of the system.
The interpretation should begin with exactly what can be seen.
Begin with observation, not explanation
A strong interpretation starts by describing the images without immediately assigning a cause.
Responsible observation
In the first visualization, a broad pink area extends across the upper chest, throat, shoulders and upper back. In the second visualization, the pink is less prominent across several parts of that region, and the blue field appears more evenly filled.
Premature conclusion
The energizing healed emotional trauma stored in the chest and shoulders.
The first statement describes the visualization.
The second assumes:
- A specific emotional cause
- A treatment effect
- A healing outcome
- A proven connection between the two
Those conclusions cannot be established from two visual images alone.
The most credible wording remains close to the evidence:
The pattern displayed by the system changed after the energizing stage.
Three different kinds of change
When examining a before-and-after scan, separate three questions.
1. Did the visualization change?
This can be answered by comparing the outputs.
Possible visible changes include:
- Less pink in one region
- More pink in another
- A highlighted area changing shape
- The blue grid appearing fuller
- A difference becoming visible from the back
- A more symmetrical appearance
- Minimal visible change
This is the clearest level of observation.
2. Did the client feel different?
The client may report:
- Feeling calmer
- Feeling lighter
- Feeling more energized
- Feeling emotionally affected
- Feeling tired
- Noticing warmth or tingling
- Feeling no immediate difference
These are valid personal experiences.
They should be recorded as subjective reports:
I felt calmer after the session.
Not converted automatically into medical conclusions:
My nervous system was clinically repaired.
Expectations, context and the way a practitioner interacts with someone can influence a person’s experience independently of the specific mechanism being proposed. NCCIH describes the placebo effect as a beneficial outcome connected with the expectation that an intervention will help and notes that the practitioner relationship can also influence the response.
That does not make the experience imaginary.
It means subjective improvement and proof of one specific mechanism are different claims.
3. Did a medical or physiological condition change?
That question cannot be answered by the visualization alone.
To conclude that a defined health condition improved, you would need an appropriate outcome measure, such as:
- Clinical examination
- Validated symptom assessment
- Laboratory testing
- Medical imaging
- Physiological measurement
- Observation over a suitable period
- Comparison with an appropriate control where research claims are being made
See Your Aura explicitly states that its service is not a medical examination, laboratory test, EEG, ECG, MEG, MRI or diagnostic procedure, and that no particular physical, emotional or energetic outcome is guaranteed.
What changes can you look for?
Changes in the amount of pink
Pink identifies areas where the field displays as weaker within the system’s visual model.
The second visualization may show:
- Less pink
- More pink
- A smaller concentrated area
- A wider but lighter-looking area
- A shifted distribution
- No obvious difference
Less pink can be described as:
The system displays less pink in this region after energizing.
It should not be described automatically as:
The body is now healthier in this region.
Changes in field coverage
The blue grid may appear to:
- Extend farther
- Fill an area more completely
- Become more continuous
- Look more even
- Remain broadly unchanged
A fuller-looking grid is a visual characteristic of the model.
It is not a validated measurement of overall health, vitality or organ function.
Changes in shape
A highlighted region may:
- Contract
- Expand
- Break into smaller areas
- Join another area
- Move visually within the model
- Appear different because of the angle
Shape changes are best assessed using the complete rotation rather than relying on one still frame.
Differences between the left and right sides
The second visualization may appear more symmetrical—or less symmetrical—than the first.
Symmetry can be visually interesting, but a more symmetrical field should not automatically be called medically superior.
Bodies themselves are not perfectly symmetrical, and visual balance within a proprietary model is not a clinical health score.
Differences between the front and back
A change may appear strong from the front but small from the back.
Another may be almost invisible in a front still image but become obvious during the rotation.
This is why See Your Aura supplies a full 360° visualization rather than one flat picture.
Compare like with like
A reliable visual comparison should use equivalent views.
Compare:
- Front with front
- Right side with right side
- Back with back
- Left side with left side
- The same approximate point in each rotating video
Do not compare a front view from the first visualization with an angled side view from the second and conclude that the field changed dramatically.
Differences in viewpoint can affect how a three-dimensional pattern appears.
The same principle applies to:
- Image scale
- Cropping
- Video playback position
- Screen brightness
- Enlargement
- Viewing distance
Whenever possible, show the images at the same size and orientation.
Why visual change does not automatically prove causation
The sequence appears straightforward:
- First visualization
- Energizing
- Second visualization
- Visible difference
It is tempting to conclude:
The energizing caused every difference.
That may be the interpretation within the service, but the sequence alone does not scientifically establish cause.
Before-and-after comparisons can be affected by several possibilities.
Natural variation in the system
Any measurement or visualization method can produce some variation between repeated outputs.
To understand whether a change exceeds normal variability, the system would need repeatability testing under comparable conditions.
Measurement science distinguishes repeatability and reproducibility because repeated results can vary according to the instrument, operator, environment and procedure.
Differences in input or processing
Possible influences could include:
- How the photograph is handled
- Operator choices
- Processing settings
- The exact point selected for a still image
- Software behaviour
- Other procedural variables
This does not mean these factors necessarily caused a particular difference.
It means they should be considered when making strong claims.
Regression toward the average
When an initial result is especially extreme, a later result may naturally appear less extreme even without an effective intervention.
This statistical phenomenon is called regression to the mean. It can cause repeated data to look as though meaningful improvement occurred when part of the change reflects ordinary variation.
A single client comparison cannot determine how much, if any, of this phenomenon applies to a particular visualization.
Expectation and attention
When someone expects a meaningful experience, they may notice sensations, emotions or changes they would otherwise have overlooked.
This does not invalidate their experience.
It does mean that personal experience alone cannot isolate the exact mechanism responsible.
A genuine energizing-related change
It is also possible within the service’s interpretive framework that the difference is connected with the energizing stage.
The central issue is not that this interpretation must be rejected.
It is that the image alone cannot prove it scientifically or demonstrate a medical mechanism.
Does this make the before-and-after comparison meaningless?
No.
It means the comparison should be used for the purpose it can support.
A before-and-after visualization can provide:
- A clear visual reference
- A structured comparison
- A basis for personal reflection
- A way to discuss what changed
- A record the client can revisit
- Questions to explore over time
- A more tangible experience than verbal interpretation alone
Not every useful experience needs to be a clinical test.
The problem arises only when a reflective wellness visualization is presented as medical evidence.
How Yvette can interpret the change responsibly
Step 1: Describe the first image
Begin with the pattern before energizing.
For example:
The initial visualization displays a broad area of pink across the upper chest and throat, continuing around the shoulders into the upper back.
Step 2: Describe the second image
Explain what visibly differs.
In the second visualization, the blue field appears more continuous across several parts of that region, while the pink areas are smaller and less concentrated.
Step 3: Identify what remained
A good interpretation should not focus only on improvement.
Some pink remains visible around the upper chest and shoulder area.
This makes the report more balanced and specific.
Step 4: Offer possible personal meaning
Within the energetic framework of the scan, this region may invite reflection on responsibility, expression and the need for rest.
Step 5: Avoid converting symbolism into diagnosis
Do not write:
Your throat blockage has been removed.
Use:
The displayed pattern around the throat changed, which may be useful to consider alongside your own experience of expression and communication.
Step 6: Ask what the client noticed
- Did you feel anything during or after the process?
- Does the location feel relevant?
- What part of the interpretation connects with your experience?
- What does not fit?
- What might you observe over the next few days?
The client’s response matters more than forcing one predetermined meaning.
A responsible reading of the genuine example
The sample currently shown on See Your Aura includes a visibly stronger pink pattern across the upper body before energizing and a field that appears more evenly filled afterwards. The written sample associates the upper-body pattern with possible themes of carrying responsibility, holding words and needing genuine rest.
A responsible summary would be:
The second visualization shows a visible reduction in several of the pink areas across the upper body. Within the energetic framework of the report, Yvette interprets this as greater support in areas connected symbolically with responsibility and expression. The images do not establish a medical improvement or prove a specific emotional cause.
That language preserves:
- The observable visual difference
- Yvette’s interpretation
- The personal usefulness
- The evidential boundary
What if the second visualization shows much less pink?
A large visual difference may feel striking.
You can describe it accurately:
- The pink area became substantially smaller.
- The field appears more evenly filled.
- The second model is visually different from the first.
- The change is visible from several angles.
A large difference does not allow you to conclude automatically:
- A major medical healing occurred.
- The person is now healthy.
- A trauma has been resolved.
- The energetic process will have a permanent effect.
- No further medical attention is needed.
The size of the visual difference and the size of a health effect are not interchangeable.
What if there is only a small difference?
A subtle change does not mean:
- The process failed
- The person was resistant
- Their energy is unusually blocked
- Something dangerous is present
- They need to purchase another session immediately
There is no promised minimum level of visual change.
A responsible report may simply state:
The overall pattern remained broadly similar, with smaller differences visible in these areas.
Naming limited change plainly builds trust.
What if the second visualization shows more pink?
More pink should not automatically be interpreted as deterioration.
It could represent:
- A different displayed pattern
- A newly prominent region
- Variation between outputs
- A change in distribution rather than an overall increase
- A feature that becomes clearer from another angle
- Something the practitioner wants to examine more closely
The client should not be told that more pink means:
- They became ill
- The energizing caused damage
- A hidden condition has emerged
- Urgent additional treatment is required
The correct first step is description and careful review.
What if nothing changes?
No visible change is also a valid result.
The report should not manufacture a difference that cannot be seen.
Possible wording:
The two visualizations are broadly similar, and no major change is evident in the overall distribution.
The client may still have found the process interesting or personally meaningful.
The absence of visible change should not be framed as personal failure.
Can the result show that the energizing “worked”?
That depends on how worked is defined.
If “worked” means the displayed output changed
A visible before-and-after difference supports that observation.
If “worked” means the client experienced something personally meaningful
The client’s own report can answer that.
If “worked” means a medical condition improved
The scan cannot establish this.
If “worked” means the mechanism has been scientifically proven
Two individual visualizations cannot establish that conclusion.
It is therefore better to ask:
What changed in the visualization, and what did the client experience?
rather than:
Did this prove the treatment worked?
How to review your own before-and-after scan
Watch both videos completely
Do not rely only on one selected screenshot.
Watch the full rotation and note:
- Where differences begin
- Whether they continue around the body
- Which areas appear stable
- Whether left and right differ
- Whether the back tells a different story from the front
Write down visible observations first
Before reading the interpretation, note:
- Less pink near the shoulders
- Blue grid more continuous across the chest
- Similar pattern in the lower body
- One remaining highlighted region near the back
This helps separate your observation from the practitioner’s interpretation.
Record your subjective experience separately
Write:
- I felt relaxed.
- I noticed warmth.
- I felt emotional.
- I slept well afterwards.
- I noticed no immediate physical difference.
Your feelings matter, but they are a different form of evidence from the visual output.
Read Yvette’s interpretation
Ask:
- Which parts resonate?
- Which parts feel uncertain?
- Is the language offered as a possibility or a certainty?
- Does the interpretation match what can actually be seen?
- Is any medical claim being implied?
Consider what you want to observe next
You may choose to observe:
- Energy levels
- Sleep
- Mood
- Boundaries
- Stress
- Physical tension
- Communication
- Rest
- A theme raised in the report
This is reflection, not medical monitoring.
A simple before-and-after review table
| | |
| :-: | :-: |
| \*\*Question\*\* | \*\*What to record\*\* |
| What visibly changed? | Shape, pink areas, field coverage and viewing angles |
| What remained similar? | Stable regions and overall pattern |
| What did I personally feel? | Sensations, mood, energy or no noticeable change |
| What did Yvette interpret? | Themes and reflection prompts |
| What is still uncertain? | Cause, mechanism and medical significance |
| What will I observe next? | One or two realistic areas of attention |
This prevents the most common error:
Turning an interesting visual difference into a conclusion the image cannot support.
Before-and-after images are not the same as a scientific trial
A scientific study designed to test whether an intervention caused a result generally needs more than one person and two images.
Depending on the research question, it may require:
- Repeated baseline measurements
- Standardized procedures
- A comparison or control group
- Blinding
- Predetermined outcomes
- Validated measurement tools
- Statistical analysis
- Independent replication
Without those safeguards, apparent changes can be influenced by natural variation, regression to the mean, measurement uncertainty, expectation and other factors.
This does not mean individual before-and-after examples should never be shown.
It means they should be labelled accurately:
A genuine individual example—not clinical proof.
Why showing a real example still builds credibility
A genuine sample allows prospective clients to see:
- The appearance of the visualization
- The extent of the 360° rotation
- The kind of difference that may appear
- The style of Yvette’s interpretation
- The format of the written report
- What is included before they pay
See Your Aura makes a real sample available and states that each client’s report will reflect their own scan.
The sample becomes more credible—not less—when it includes a clear statement that individual results vary and the visual change is not medical evidence.
How client stories should describe before-and-after results
Strong, responsible wording
I noticed that the pink areas around my shoulders were visibly smaller in the second visualization, and I also felt calmer after the process.
This reports:
- What was seen
- What was felt
without claiming causation.
Wording that goes too far
The scan proved that the energizing healed my shoulder and released the trauma stored there.
This turns:
- A visual difference
- A personal feeling
- A symbolic interpretation
into a medical and causal claim.
Testimonials should remain in the client’s authentic voice, but the surrounding website context should clarify that personal experiences are individual and do not establish clinical effectiveness.
Questions worth asking about any before-and-after image
- Are these images from the same person?
- Were they created using the same process?
- Are equivalent angles being compared?
- Has either image been cropped, recoloured or enhanced?
- Is the example genuine?
- Is the provider describing visible change or claiming medical healing?
- Are individual limitations stated?
- Is the result typical, exceptional or unknown?
- Can the complete videos be viewed?
- Does the provider explain what did not change?
A credible before-and-after example should inform rather than manipulate.
Red flags in before-and-after marketing
Be cautious when a provider:
- Shows only one carefully selected angle
- Uses different image sizes
- Changes colour or contrast between images
- Claims that every difference proves healing
- Offers no explanation of the system’s normal variability
- Uses one client image as proof that the method treats disease
- States that more pink means illness
- Claims that less pink guarantees health
- Pressures clients into repeat sessions because the image did not change enough
- Presents emotional symbolism as medical fact
- Does not disclose that results vary
The goal should be understanding—not persuasion at any cost.
When medical assessment remains important
A more even-looking biofield visualization does not replace appropriate care.
Seek professional evaluation for:
- Persistent or worsening symptoms
- New pain
- Chest pain
- Breathing difficulty
- Neurological symptoms
- Signs of infection
- Unexplained weight changes
- Severe fatigue
- Mental-health concerns
- Any symptom that worries you
The second visualization cannot medically clear a person or show that a condition has resolved. See Your Aura advises clients to continue consulting qualified healthcare professionals for symptoms and treatment questions.
What this article does not prove
This article does not establish that:
- Energizing causes every difference between the images.
- Less pink means better physical health.
- More blue means an organ has healed.
- The visualization measures inflammation.
- A visual change proves emotional release.
- Client-reported sensations prove a specific mechanism.
- A before-and-after case establishes clinical efficacy.
- Remote energizing treats disease.
- No change means the process failed.
- A large change predicts a lasting outcome.
It explains how to examine a genuine visual comparison without asking the image to prove more than it can.
Frequently asked questions
Why are two scans included?
The two scans allow you to compare the visualization before and after the energizing stage. This is a core part of the See Your Aura service.
Does less pink mean the energizing worked?
It means the system displays less pink in the second visualization.
That may be interpreted positively within the energetic framework of the scan, but it does not independently prove a health improvement.
Does a fuller blue field mean I am healthier?
Not medically.
It describes the appearance of the generated model, not a validated whole-body health score.
What if there is no visible difference?
No guaranteed amount of change is promised.
A limited difference does not mean you resisted the process or require urgent additional work.
What if more pink appears afterwards?
It means the second visualization displays a different pattern.
It should not automatically be interpreted as deterioration or harm.
Can I feel a change even when the images look similar?
Yes, a client may report a subjective experience even when the visual outputs appear similar.
The personal feeling and the visualization are related parts of the experience but should be recorded separately.
Can the images change even when I feel nothing?
Yes.
The system may produce visually different outputs even when the client does not notice an immediate subjective change.
Does the comparison prove that remote energizing is scientifically validated?
No.
One before-and-after example cannot establish a mechanism or clinical effectiveness.
Why might repeated images naturally differ?
Repeated outputs can vary because of system repeatability, procedural conditions, operator choices and other sources of uncertainty. Understanding normal variability would require systematic testing.
What is regression to the mean?
It is the tendency for unusually extreme initial values to be followed by values closer to the average when measured again. It can sometimes make ordinary variation appear to be improvement.
Does expectation mean the experience is not real?
No.
Expectation can influence genuine subjective experiences and outcomes. It simply means that the specific cause may be difficult to isolate.
Should I use the second image to decide whether to stop treatment?
No.
The visualization should not be used to start, discontinue or alter medical or mental-health treatment.
Can I repeat the scan later?
A later scan could provide another visual point of comparison.
It should still be understood as a wellness visualization rather than proof of medical progress.
The bottom line
The before-and-after comparison is one of the most interesting parts of a 360° biofield scan.
It lets you see:
- What the system displayed before energizing
- What it displayed afterwards
- Which areas changed
- Which remained similar
- How the differences appear from every angle
That visual change can be meaningful.
It may support reflection, raise questions and give you something tangible to revisit.
The most credible interpretation is also the simplest:
The visualization changed. Yvette helps you explore what that change may mean within the framework of the scan.
The images do not independently prove healing, diagnosis or causation.
You do not need to dismiss the difference.
You only need to describe it as it is.
Compare a genuine scan for yourself
Watch the complete rotation, examine the front, sides and back and see how the displayed field changes following energizing.